<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conductor, leader, model?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conductorsblog.com/2009/10/29/conductor-leader-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conductorsblog.com/2009/10/29/conductor-leader-model/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrandonM</title>
		<link>http://conductorsblog.com/2009/10/29/conductor-leader-model/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BrandonM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conductorsblog.com/?p=226#comment-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article reminds me of another recent editorial (which unfortunately I cannot exactly recall to reference) that hypothesizes that conductors are relics of a past age and they represent everything insidious about the music business. I think the oft-recurring theme highlights that the conductor&#039;s image in the public eye has begun a state of flux; the hoary, wise &quot;maestro&quot; is becoming ever more ridiculed, denounced, and even despised. 

However, the recent excitement (even hype) surrounding Dudamel&#039;s arrival in Los Angeles reinforces the conductor&#039;s potential for reinvigoration in orchestral organizations. 

It appears, for now, a conductor&#039;s relevance depends on their ability to inspire enthusiasm. Those that can&#039;t manage it will have a hard time succeeding from now on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article reminds me of another recent editorial (which unfortunately I cannot exactly recall to reference) that hypothesizes that conductors are relics of a past age and they represent everything insidious about the music business. I think the oft-recurring theme highlights that the conductor&#8217;s image in the public eye has begun a state of flux; the hoary, wise &#8220;maestro&#8221; is becoming ever more ridiculed, denounced, and even despised. </p>
<p>However, the recent excitement (even hype) surrounding Dudamel&#8217;s arrival in Los Angeles reinforces the conductor&#8217;s potential for reinvigoration in orchestral organizations. </p>
<p>It appears, for now, a conductor&#8217;s relevance depends on their ability to inspire enthusiasm. Those that can&#8217;t manage it will have a hard time succeeding from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

